Friday, December 16, 2011

Copping it

The WA police officer who shot his glock twice at a car full of Aboriginal women and children, Niko Westergerling, pleaded guilty to discharging a firearm in public and got a $5000 fine today. Westergerling was also fined in March this year in the Magistrates Court, for kicking and punching a woman, but was allowed to remain in the police service.

According to police policy in WA, when an officer commits a criminal offence and that offence is considered to affect their performance or presents a risk, the WA Police attempt to identify the causal factors. Once the assessment takes place, and any risk has been assessed, managed and mitigated, an officer may be returned to frontline duties.
Where the catalyst for the criminal offence relates to knowledge or skills, the officer may be sent for re-training.
Where the cause of a criminal offence is 'behavioural' and stems from factors like stress or an officer's inability to control themselves and make sound decisions, they are then referred for a 'Fitness for Duty' assessment by qualified medical persons. The assessment may include behavioural and therapeutic treatment or programs designed to prevent a repetition of the conduct.
The victim of the assault was Westergerling's wife.
In WA, another police officer was found guilty of attempting to pervert the course of justice. The offence occurred during a 2009 investigation into neo-nazi and white supremacist groups in Perth. Robert David Critchley had been working with the elite intel unit doing telephone interceptions, when he tipped off the friend of one neo-nazi who was affiliated with a Perth branch of UK hate group Combat 18. Three offenders from the group later pleaded guilty to shooting at the roof of the Cannington Mosque when they were drunk. Two of the offenders were former Australian Defence Force employees.
Apparently, random drug testing was introduced for WA police officers on December 3.
Two VicPol officers have copped it for assaulting two 'hoons' doing burn-outs near their station.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

So what'd happen if the shoe was on the other foot and the cop was on the other end of this shooting incident - I don't think it would result in a fine.

The Daily Magnet said...

I can see what you mean but it looks like the courts might be implying that to do errant, dangerous things with your glock might be an occupational hazard for police?

The Daily Magnet said...

Maybe it's time to review the gun policy. Only the CIB could carry them when I was a kid - the change to seeing every cop carrying a deadly weapon(instead of driving one) was definitely a weird vibe.

Anonymous said...

What about that policy?!! What does that say about the way WA Police view domestic violence?!! As if a conviction like that doesn't foretell the way an officer will use his powers. Far freakin out and here he is with a gun - so how many others are there? How many crooks could use that brain snap excuse?

The Daily Magnet said...

"...and here he is with a gun..."

and here he is... with a telephone interception warrant/taser/cattle prod/coat hanger & rubber hose/phone book/high powered vehicle etc etc

different names, same yarn

Garry Ladouceur said...

We have cops like this too in canada who do not like aboriginal people much. we have aboriginal people in canada called Indians.

They are mostly mounties and many believe that the Indians are a species of usually drunk animals not human

The Daily Magnet said...

Hey G, well that's a different view of Mounties than the world normally sees - same old propaganda about Aboriginal people, though.

How's the weather?